Chemical Analysis: Heavy Metals, Total Content (34 Elements)

Total content heavy metals analysis by microwave digestion with ICP-MS and ICP-OES, following ISO 10993-18. Thirty-four elements are quantified so the toxicologist can read each against its tolerable intake.

SKU: GRK-2007
Availability:
Price: Call for pricing

When this test applies

ISO 10993-1:2025 makes chemical characterisation to ISO 10993-18 the starting point of a biological evaluation for prolonged and long-term contact devices, and the preferred route to the systemic, genotoxicity and carcinogenicity endpoints wherever good extractables data can replace an animal study. Elemental analysis is the inorganic half of that profile: metals and metalloids are not seen by the organic screens, and several — lead, cadmium, nickel, cobalt, chromium — carry low tolerable intakes under ISO 10993-17 and ICH Q3D.

When to run it

Early in the chemistry programme, on finished, sterilised material. It is quick and relatively inexpensive, and a metal above its reporting limit usually points at a pigment, catalyst residue, filler or alloy that you want to know about before the organic screens are interpreted.

What the result tells you

A concentration, or a value below the reporting limit, for each of the 34 elements. Elements are quantified against their reporting limits rather than an analytical evaluation threshold, which applies to organic extractables; each concentration is then carried into the ISO 10993-17 risk assessment and compared with tolerable intake.

What it does not tell you

Nothing about organic extractables — VOC, SVOC and NVOC are separate screens. It reports total content, not speciation, so a high reading identifies an element to evaluate rather than a toxic form. Chemical characterisation has no independent pass or fail: the data mean nothing until a toxicologist reads them against exposure under ISO 10993-17, and the screen cannot see compounds the solvent did not extract or the technique cannot detect.

Method

Testing per ISO 10993-18:2020/Amd 1:2022. The sample is extracted in water and digested in concentrated nitric acid by microwave, and the digest is analysed by ICP-MS and ICP-OES for 34 elements. Extraction ratio follows ISO 10993-12: 6 cm²/mL for material under 0.5 mm thick, 3 cm²/mL at 0.5 mm or thicker, or 0.1 to 0.2 g/mL where surface area is indeterminate.

Where it runs

Testing is performed to Groenakker protocols at an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratory in Groenakker’s network, and the report is issued under Groenakker’s ISO 13485:2016 certified quality system, in Groenakker’s report template or in your document template on request at no extra cost.

Usually ordered alongside

The other screens that make up a complete extractables profile — VOC, SVOC, NVOC and heavy metals across the three solvents — then the toxicological risk assessment (GRK-2001) that turns the compound list into a conclusion. The ChemTox packages bundle all of this for one price.

Products specifications
SubcontractedYes
StandardsISO 10993-18:2020/Amd 1:2022
EndpointChemical Characterisation
Method detail
Turnaround4-5 weeks
Test systemAnalytical — ICP-MS / ICP-OES
MethodICP-MS / ICP-OES, 34 elements
Extraction1 extract at 10 mL per extract. Extraction ratio per ISO 10993-12: 6 cm2/mL for material under 0.5 mm thick, 3 cm2/mL at 0.5 mm or thicker, or 0.1-0.2 g/mL where surface area is indeterminate.
Acceptance criteriaChemical characterization has no independent pass or fail. Elements are quantified against the reporting limit for each element, not an analytical evaluation threshold, which applies to organic extractables screening. Concentrations are carried into the ISO 10993-17 toxicological risk assessment against tolerable intake, which is signed by a DABT board-certified toxicologist.
DeliverableAnalytical report with raw data and the compound list, issued in Groenakker’s report template or in your document template on request at no extra cost. Results carry into the ISO 10993-17 toxicological risk assessment, which is signed by a DABT board-certified toxicologist.
*
*
*