Chemical Analysis: Heavy Metals, Total Content (34 Elements)

Total elemental content is the metals arm of an extractables profile: the device extract is analysed by ICP-MS and ICP-OES and 34 elements are quantified. It is the dataset an ISO 10993-17 assessment needs in order to reach a conclusion about patient safety.

SKU: GRK-2007
Availability:
Price: Call for pricing

When this test applies

Chemical characterisation is the backbone of the modern route through ISO 10993-1:2025 — it is how endpoints get addressed with data instead of animals. Total elemental content is the metals arm of that profile, and it applies wherever the material, its pigments, catalysts, fillers or processing aids could contribute elemental impurities.

When to run it

Early, and before you commission biological testing you may not need. Chemistry paired with an ISO 10993-17 assessment can close out several endpoints outright, so running it first tends to shrink the programme. Running it after the animal studies inverts both the logic and the cost.

What the result gives you

A GLP report quantifying each of the 34 elements against its reporting limit, with the extraction conditions documented — issued in Groenakker’s template — or in yours on request at no extra cost — under Groenakker’s ISO 13485:2016 certified quality system. If your own toxicologist writes the assessment, this is the dataset they need and the documentation trail a reviewer will ask for. If you would rather we reached the conclusion, the ISO 10993-17 assessment is the next line item.

What it does not settle

Chemical characterisation has no independent pass or fail. Elements are reported against analytical reporting limits, not against a safety threshold, so the judgment about patient safety is made in the ISO 10993-17 assessment rather than here. This analysis also covers elements only — volatile, semi-volatile and non-volatile organics and non-volatile residue are separate arms across separate solvents. A profile that covers one arm and not the polarity and volatility range is the most common gap a reviewer finds.

Method

Testing per ISO 10993-18:2020/Amd 1:2022. One extract is prepared at 10 mL, using the ISO 10993-12 extraction ratios: 6 cm2/mL for material under 0.5 mm thick, 3 cm2/mL at 0.5 mm or thicker, or 0.1–0.2 g/mL where surface area is indeterminate. The extract is analysed by ICP-MS and ICP-OES for 34 elements, each quantified against its reporting limit. Turnaround 4–5 weeks.

Where it runs

The analytical work is subcontracted to an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited, GLP certified laboratory. The report is issued under Groenakker’s ISO 13485:2016 certified quality system, in your document format.

Usually ordered alongside

The organic screens across the solvent range — VOC, SVOC, NVOC and non-volatile residue in water, isopropyl alcohol and n-hexane — and an ISO 10993-17 toxicological risk assessment to interpret the whole profile. ChemTox bundles the chemistry and the assessment as one programme; if you are not sure how much of the range your device needs, start with a biological evaluation plan.

Products specifications
SubcontractedYes
StandardsISO 10993-18:2020/Amd 1:2022
EndpointChemical Characterisation
Method detail
Turnaround4-5 weeks
Test systemAnalytical — ICP-MS / ICP-OES
MethodICP-MS / ICP-OES, 34 elements
Extraction1 extract at 10 mL per extract. Extraction ratio per ISO 10993-12: 6 cm2/mL for material under 0.5 mm thick, 3 cm2/mL at 0.5 mm or thicker, or 0.1-0.2 g/mL where surface area is indeterminate.
Acceptance criteriaChemical characterization has no independent pass or fail. Elements are quantified against the reporting limit for each element, not an analytical evaluation threshold, which applies to organic extractables screening. Concentrations are carried into the ISO 10993-17 toxicological risk assessment against tolerable intake, which is signed by a DABT board-certified toxicologist.
DeliverableAnalytical report with raw data and the compound list, issued in Groenakker’s report template or in your document template on request at no extra cost. Results carry into the ISO 10993-17 toxicological risk assessment, which is signed by a DABT board-certified toxicologist.
*
*
*